Part 11: Lawsuits Against Suno, Potential Outcomes, and Where AI-Assisted Music Goes From There

We’re at a fever-level crossroads in the way of AI, and many of the bigger issues on how to regulate it all (you know, about it potentially destroying humanity) are still up in the air. In the realm of music, however, it seems some general consensus is being met, despite some lawsuits still pending, particularly at Suno. As the leading source of AI-assisted music creation, Suno has a major tug-of-war going on with some industry support—while others are still going after it for absorbing prior voices/songs like a digital sponge.

The most interesting thing happening with Suno now is it has one power player working alongside them in properly licensing music. On the other, you have another major corporate entity still going after Suno for using their earlier training method of accumulating existing musical IP. Chances are looking better that recording labels may fall in line with Suno over time based on a new business structure of licensing existing recordings. 

Much of this can only happen because Suno is exploding in subscribers and general users—which includes myself to create studio-quality recordings of my own songs.

Regardless, the question remains of whether Suno can still manage to overcome all their other lawsuits—not including the growing public aversion to AI-created songs.

The New Warner Music Deal

If you use Suno in any capacity, you know they just released their V6 model. While some attest V5.5 was better, that old version is now retired. And it’s a symbolic gesture since V6 brings a new way to use prior existing music to the Suno app. They just made a deal with Warner Music Group, BMG, and Believe to license all their music for use in AI creations. The deal ensures the original creators of that music get compensated for the collective use on Suno for AI-created music.

Perhaps that seems like a major capitulation on the part of several major music labels. Regardless, it was always about money over the ethical qualities of creating things with AI. You can debate forever about whether it’s still an ethical practice, despite making it all about everyone financially benefiting on both ends.

It’s this development that now retires the old system of Suno’s training model using music without proper licensing. Even I admit the studio recordings I made of my first two songs seem like a compilation of existing voices, instrumentations, and choir sounds. I even went so far as to say the male singer on my single of “Whispered Thoughts” sounded like—um, Drake Shelton.

Some critics now say the V6 update is less superior to V5.5, though. I haven’t tried V6 yet on my prior songs or any new ones. A few users say the quality is more basic over the more believable voices and studio sounds 5.5 had. There’s a possibility that Suno had to lessen the quality just to stay alive. Prior to planning this segment of The Human Project, it appeared that Suno was soon going under with mounting lawsuits across the board.

This isn’t to say they still don’t have legal hurdles to overcome. They can’t completely erase their earlier model system that probably makes up over a billion or more songs already on streaming services around the world.

Other Lawsuits Still Pending

Last year, Sony/Universal filed a major lawsuit against Suno based on latter using copyrighted material in their original AI training methods. Suno can’t immediately shake this lawsuit based on all the songs already created using that process. It includes those who merely use Suno as a technological assist (like me) to make their written songs sound like they were recorded professionally. 

In a time when the expenses for studio time are beyond many budgets, being able to hear your songs fully realized on Suno has been a major creative convenience. Not that I didn’t realize the sounds you hear on my two songs are a likely amalgam of prior voices and instruments. Sure, there’s a sense of ethical guilt about that, even if all future V6 songs may change everyone’s outlook.

Suno still contends that fair use was at play on their old training model, something you can argue as fact when mixing existing IP ultimately turns into something else. I waver in my legal beliefs on this since there’s still a major difference between creating voices and sounds from scratch rather than borrowing from them. But, with my own songs, I managed to create original songs that still sound original thanks to using that library of audio. 

Whether Suno can beat this lawsuit in coming months (or years) is still up in the air. Their biggest pain is also being sued by performance rights organizations, particularly overseas. Those contend that Suno, through their prior model, didn’t properly compensate artists based on the audio taken. 

Most notable there are lawsuits from performance rights organizations overseas and in Canada. For the latter, it’s SOCAN (The Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada) going after SUNO recently for reproducing and/or copying songs from the org’s catalog. They say over 150 works were essentially stolen as part of Suno’s training model. Then you have GEMA from Germany that went after Suno for similar reasons. In that case, Suno lost the case in saying they infringed copyrights.

Outside of America, Suno still faces some serious threats, even if the chances are greater they’ll overcome now with the above deals and new business philosophy. Ultimately, though, it’s up to the world populace on whether they really survive far into the future as a technological creative assist.

Will the Public Backlash Against AI Hurt Suno Long-Term?

You’ve likely seen the evidence that the public is starting to speak out against AI due to the fears of it becoming a massive super-intelligence. Other proof is out there showing a backlash against AI music in particular, even though it’s undeniable Suno has a record amount of users and listeners.

Last report showed they have 100 million users around the world, not including an evaluation at $5.4 billion. A good chunk of the world is either using the app or going in to listen to music produced there. Perhaps the creators signing up are creating while secretly abhorring what AI is doing in music. Others (like me) possibly realize they could save money using Suno as a music production studio while still writing their own songs.

No lists are available showing exactly what parts of the 100 million users are doing there. One thing we have to admit, though, is that many people continue using things they feel guilty using. It doesn’t have to be said what those might be, though Suno may be a guilty pleasure for far too many people. In fact, some may just use it for personal entertainment rather than thinking they can make money off their songs. 

The numbers still show there’s some level of acceptability of AI in the world of music. Whether it continues in a time when AI CEOs are saying AI could eventually run amok and kill off humanity before the end of the decade is worth looking at closely.

As long as AI can stay as business and creative assists only, it’ll have already helped hundreds of millions of people accomplish things without taking away personal creation or ambition. Suno, with its new licensing agreement, also shows personal responsibility in protecting IP, despite there always being an argument on whether reusing past creative works really amounts to fair use. 

I’ll continue to use Suno to create studio recordings of songs I write myself. Recently, I was preparing to find alternatives in the event Suno would shut down before the year was out due to its legal problems. Now it’s clear they’ll be around, and may end up being the most profitable survivor as Hollywood banishes AI, and AI business assistants become a little too scary to use.

All that, unless Suno’s AI bots start going rogue and end up screwing over those who use it merely to avoid studio production costs. I’ve noticed the more prompts you fed it on Version 5.5, the system would basically rebel and ignore your changes to go its own way. While some might say it could improve a song this way, going off the path of our own creative directions could signal a future Frankenstein’s monster scenario at Suno as well. 

In Part 12, I’ll look at all the brouhaha over AI agents possibly destroying humanity someday. What are the chances of AI shutting down essential functions of your job within a short time—hence disrupting your job and career already?

/End

Part 10: My Experience Using Suno Pro to Create a Studio Quality Single of a Song I Wrote

One of my creative pursuits outside of writing (and a 14-year freelance writing career), was music performance and writing songs. I was even given a chance to be a piano accompanist to a singer on the road once, but I turned it down to avoid living in hotels (no, possibly motels) every night. Regardless, the passion for writing songs that could be creative, yet still mainstream, went on. Much of that stagnated during my busy writing career years. Only in the last couple of years have I seriously gone back to finally realizing some songs swimming around in my head.

The irony here is that I’d just started this new blog theme about AI and human creativity while finishing up a new song from last year. I was hoping to find a way to create a studio-quality version of the song, yet didn’t have the resources to hire out musicians and record a demo in a local studio. Despite having a work colleague who leases a local music studio, it still would cost considerable money to hire a singer and musicians for possibly several days of recording sessions.

Enter my curiosity with Suno, particularly their Suno Pro tier. I thought to myself, why not just dive in, sign up for Suno Pro for $10 per month, and then create a studio version of my song? It was a test to see whether my initial aversion toward Suno was perhaps too much of an impulsive negative response. 

What happened afterward changed my view on the usefulness of Suno Pro, even if I still have reservations about how it turns your songs into ear-popping studio magic.

You’ll Be Shocked at the First Suno Pro Results

We all know that many AI bots are a bit, what shall we say—(stupid?)—in realizing our prompts. You really have to be overly specific or use key language to get many AI bots to accurately create what you want. The problem there is, you shouldn’t become a lethargic creator and let AI bots create everything for you. It requires a lot more in explanation if you want it to create everything from scratch. In my case, I just wanted a studio-quality take of my first song called “Whispered Thoughts (The Girl Who Reads My Mind).”

All I did was write one small paragraph of prompts to make Suno Pro create a studio take with a male singer. I didn’t need anything else since I write all my songs organically at the piano on the Notion composing app. Yes, I use an Apple Pencil on my iPad Pro to write it all out one note/chord at a time—with my own lyrics. 

The most amazing thing about Suno is that it seems to get what you want right from the first take. When I played back the first cut with a male singer, I was impressed at hearing the song fully realized with studio sound. This was after months of just hearing a piano solo playback on the Notion app.

But then, I decided to create some alternate versions. Since my above song is intended to have gender fluidity in the lyrics, I created a female take next. It almost sounded like Taylor Swift singing, yet it turned out more than well. However, it wasn’t quite as perfect as the initial male take. After several more alternate takes with both male and female singers (including an attempted duet), Suno seemed to kind of go off the rails on making it really radio-friendly, even if the prompts hardly changed. 

Perhaps Suno should be called “One Take Suno” since it appears to give you the best possible cut on first try. All other versions seem to variate too much off the best path to a point of annoyance. Once that happens, it’s hard to get Suno to go back to the original style.

My Intentions for the Song

Thanks to the mostly stunning results from Suno Pro, my intention is to take “Whispered Thoughts” and place it on SoundCloud through their basic Artist tier. There, they’ll promote the song to the right audiences, and then it’ll stream on their site for a small price. But my full, long-term plan is to pay into a streaming distributor in the next several months and get the song out to many other streaming outlets. A distributor like DistroKid can help on that front, not including joining a publishing watchdog group to help with royalties on other media uses. Also, joining performance rights organizations like ASCAP or BMI brings additional eyes to your songs and pays you when it’s played somewhere.

All of this goes on the idea that the initial singers will not be me, but digital creations. At the core of importance, though, is continuously noting that I’m the complete writer of the songs. I’m still an adamant proponent of creating things from your own brain rather than letting AI constantly tempt you into creating something for you. Never will I let Suno create a song for me—even if some will argue that letting it create a studio cut is at least a quarter of an AI creation. 

I argue not, as long as you specifically tell Suno not to deviate from the music. You have to move the dials a bit on the “Options” section when putting in your prompts. They let you choose how much of a percentage of Weirdness and Style Influence you want based on the recording you feed it. In my case, I uploaded a video of the Notion app piano solo as the initial source.

I’ve Come Around to Accept AI as a Creative Assistant

My first impressions of Suno from the outset were one of derision before putting it to use. You have to be suspect at first when you realize all of the singing voices and instrumentation used to create a studio cut are taken from existing sources. This bothered me since I’m a staunch advocate for protecting IP and not having it being made available for free license.

Those who argue that a large potpourri of these musical properties constitutes copyright infringement may have to change their philosophy. I’m not saying I have, yet it’s a saving technological grace to be able to full realize a song in studio quality to save time and money. The fairest thing that could happen is for Suno to pay a small fee to the IP they use to help musicians and songwriters. Considering Suno is likely already making a bundle just on subscriptions and community use, they could arguably afford that.

Courts are still trying to mull this over as lawsuits pile up. One could argue that when existing IP is stirred into a large digital pot, it becomes something else. When it helps a songwriter like me turn a written song into a professional studio version, it’s actually becoming a reciprocal process in helping musicians. 

This is why I now consider Suno as a worthy creative assistant and nothing more. Also, I fully intend for these Suno-made studio cuts of my songs to be promotional tools in enticing a real (hopefully notable) singer to record them. Not that you can’t just sample your own voice into the system and turn the singer into something sounding like yourself. I just haven’t done this yet since the first take with the male AI singer was right on the money.

I’ll promote the song on this blog once I get it onto SoundCloud. After that, I’ll be looking into DistroKid, ASCAP or BMI, plus a mechanical rights organization (or an MLC). This entire business side setup is the new way forward if deciding to stream your own songs on streaming outlets and protect your work.

My Future Use of Suno Pro

Other songs are in the pipeline from yours truly. This includes a Christmas song that’s about done at time of this writing. That one will be a mix of Gospel-Rock and Hip-Hop. It’ll officially be my second single to group up with “Whispered Thoughts” on streaming outlets this fall.

Two other songs should follow before end of the year. One, a Country-Blues song, and the other with a Dance-Pop vibe. Latter will be a new lyrical approach in having an AI bot lamenting a relationship in a love song. 

Suno Pro will probably be used for all these in creating studio-worthy versions. My only reservations are the mounting lawsuits against Suno for using existing music and vocal properties. Should it start mounting even further, it’s possible Suno would have to shut down—or I’d look into other options. 

From now on, though, I plan to envision AI as a helpful assistant rather than assume everyone will use it as a complete creative crutch. Not that I’ll completely back down from the potential dangers of AI in taking away from human endeavors. The problem is, when handed everything, humans are going to become lazy and let the bots take over as much as possible. Many corporations are doing this now, and it doesn’t always go over or end well.

In the realm of songwriting, it’s all the more important for a human to create songs and bring out the depth of that artist’s soul. Just try letting Suno create a song for you, and you’ll immediately be able to tell the difference. That’s especially true in the realm of lyrics, something I write and hone as well.

I go forward now with the theme of this blog still intact, but with a better formed philosophy built on where AI should go and where it needs to be cut off. Whether Suno continues being a part of that remains an unknown as the complications of IP law and other opinions from other users still pend. 

In Part 11, I’ll continue my look at Suno and a recent lawsuit against them from German company GEMA in the app using copyrighted recordings for AI training. It could lead to fast changes in how even AI-assisted songs are viewed or put together.

/End